marți, 19 august 2008

cum intelege lumea evaluarea de riscuri in 2008

exista prevederi legale in Legea 319 care spun ca fiecare angajator trebuie sa fie in posesia unei evaluari de riscuri...sunt controale de la ITM care sustin ca nu exista la un agent economic o evaluare de riscuri si un plan de porevenire si protectie bazat pe aceasta...amenda ce se poate aplica este de 5000 lei pentru neducerea la indeplinire a masurii dispuse in actul de control...
ce -i de facut ?
-gasim pe cineva care sa ne faca evaluarea de riscuri si planul si platim un onorariu pentru prestatie sau
-ne instruim o persoana sau mai multe ca sa efectueze evaluarea de riscuri dupa o metoda aflata pe piata si o invatam pe aceasta sa compuna un plan de prevenire si protectie...dar si instruirea persoanelor costa
ce nu stie lumea si poate nici cei care controleaza de la ITM?
-evaluarile de riscuri au un scop utilitar,adica te ajuta sa faci ceva stiind de ce sa te feresti
-evaluarile de riscuri nu sunt definitive odata facute,pentru ca tot timpul apar schimbari in activitatile efectuate care induc riscuri noi sau modificate ca nivel
-evaluarile de riscuri trebuie sa fie legate de ceeace se face practic la un moment dat si nu trebuie sa contina riscuri ipotetice care nu au sansa sa apara sau probabilitatea lor de aparitie este asa de mica incat devine nesemnificativa pentru activitatea respectiva
apare deci o dilema
pe ce dai banii daca soliciti un serviciu de evaluare de riscuri?
cele mai indicate sunt serviciile de evaluare efectuate de profesionisti,care pot sesiza prin observare directa riscurile semnificative si previzibile la activitatile desfasurate,astfel incat masurile de prevenire si protectie sa fie reale,viabile si nu simple indicatii de a respecta legislatia....a respecta legislatia este ceva obligatoriu si nu trebuie cuprins in planul de prevenire si protectie

luni, 17 martie 2008

exista o parere oficiala despre evaluarea de riscuri in stndardul OHSAS 18002:2008

There is no single methodology for hazard identification and risk assessment that will suit all organizations. Hazard identification and risk assessment methodologies vary greatly across industries, ranging from simple assessments to complex quantitative analyses with extensive documentation. Individual hazards may require that different methods be used, e.g. an assessment of long term exposure to chemicals may need a different method than that taken for equipment safety or for assessing an office workstation. Each organization should choose approaches that are appropriate to its scope, nature and size, and which meet its needs in terms of detail, complexity, time, cost and availability of reliable data. Taken together, the chosen approaches should result in a comprehensive methodology for the ongoing evaluation of the organization’s risks.

O sa o traduc mai tarziu pentru cei care nu inteleg !

4.3.1.4 Risk assessment
4.3.1.4.1 General
Risk is the combination of the likelihood of an occurrence of a hazardous event or exposure(s) and the severity of injury or ill heath (3.8) that can be caused by the event or exposure(s) (see 3.21).
Risk assessment is a process of evaluating the risk(s) arising from a hazard(s), taking into account the adequacy of any existing controls, and deciding whether the level of risk(s) is acceptable (see 3.22).
An acceptable risk is a risk that has been reduced to a level that the organization is willing to assume with respect to its legal obligation, its OH&S policy and its OH&S objectives.
NOTE Some reference documents use the term "risk assessment" to encompass the entire process of hazard identification, determination of risk, and the selection of appropriate risk reduction or risk control measures. OHSAS 18001 and OHSAS 18002 refer to the individual elements of this process separately and use the term "risk assessment" to refer to the second of its steps, namely the determination of risk.

Poate inteleg toti specialistii in evaluare de riscuri ca scopul evaluarii nu este a fabrica hartii care sa dovedeasca respectarea cerintelor legale, ci...de a evalua acele ricuri care au un impact directa asupra oamenilor care lucreaza undeva.